
Attended a convention of scaremongers at Colwyn Bay town hall last night.
For those of you who have not been following the story, this was a meeting called to protest at the plans of Edwina Hart, Welsh Assembly health minister, to require North Wales patients to travel to South Wales for elective neurosurgery. The town hall was packed, with more than 100 people attending. The media were also out in force.
There was an impressive degree of political consensus on display. My friend and colleague, Hywel Williams, Plaid Cymru MP for Caernarfon, spoke against the proposals and in favour of continuing the present links with Walton. Two local Labour councillors expressed their disgust at Mrs. Hart's scheme and said that they were going to take part in a delegation to Cardiff to see her.
Most moving, however, were the patients and relatives of patients who spoke of their appreciation for what the Walton centre had done for them. Nobody wanted to have to travel to South Wales.
Edwina Hart is all over the shop on this issue now. She was invited to attend the meeting, but declined to do so. On Thursday evening, she sent me an e-mailed letter telling me that the meeting had been arranged on a “false premise”. No decision had been made, she said, to require patients to travel to South Wales, and any suggestion to the contrary was "scaremongering".
The people attending the meeting, however, thought otherwise. Given the clear and unambiguous policy announcement made by Mrs. Hart on 4 July, their scepticism is understandable. What she said was this:
“My overriding aim is to secure as many services as can be safely provided within Wales’s boundaries. Of course, there will always be rare conditions and highly specialist services that can only be supported by populations greater than the population of Wales. This means that, in order to get the best possible treatment, there will always be some patients who must travel outside Wales for the services that they require. However, where the Welsh population base is sufficient to support an in-country service, that is the way in which I wish to proceed.
“Therefore, in the case of adult neurosurgery, the approach that I now intend to adopt is one in which we will look as actively as possible at redirecting additional elective work generated inside Wales to the two centres at Swansea and Cardiff. I stress that I am talking here about planned operations; I have no intention of transferring emergency work from outside the area into south Wales. However, where patients know sufficiently in advance to be able to plan for the operations required, I think that planning can allow for that work to be undertaken within Wales, particularly where that may make the difference between having a Welsh-based service or the prospect of having to give up that service.”
Now Mrs. Hart is apparently suggesting, in a letter written to Labour Assembly members, that there is no question of neurosurgery patients having to travel for treatment. That statement is at odds with suggestions she has made in previous correspondence that consideration is being given to providing financial support for patients who need to travel.
Mrs. Hart would be well advised to perform as graceful a u-turn as possible on this issue. In her understandable enthusiasm to save the neurosurgery unit at Swansea, she has stirred up the biggest political hornets' nest North Wales has seen for very many years.